“My Brother’s Keeper”

vampirediaries-brotherskeeper-elenadamon-475x316

Alright, the TVD fandom has been exploding on social media since last night’s new episode, so I’ve just got to weight in. Many, many spoilers below!

First of all, I want to point out that it is not confirmed that Elena is sired to Damon. It’s a theory that Caroline came up with based on a comment from Klaus. We need to keep in mind that ALL Klaus wants is more hybrids, which means he wants human Elena. So of course he wants her with Stefan because Stefan wants her to be human too. If Elena is happy being a vamp with Damon, Klaus’s plan goes out the window. So, he WANTS Caroline to come to that conclusion! Is there evidence indicating Elena could be sired by Damon. Certainly. But let’s note that wanting the same things Damon wants is very likely because she is in love with him. And this isn’t something new. Her feelings for him have been building. There are many instances, but the kiss she gave him when he was dying and the steamy make out session at the motel last season are two that come to mind. Furthermore, there’s also plenty of evidence that she’s not sired to him. She has not done every single thing that Damon has told her to do since she’s been turned. Furthermore, Damon was surprised as anyone that Elena left Stefan because of him, so he didn’t seem to be working any sire juju. And when Tyler was sired to Klaus, Klaus had to specifically order Tyler to do things, not just think them. We haven’t seen Damon order Elena to do a single thing. Also, when Klaus forced Tyler to do things against his will, Tyler was very aware of it and did not want to do these things – like bite Caroline. When you are sired to someone, they can force your actions – not your emotions. Also, I don’t think Damon would want Elena to want him just out of a sire bond. He would want her to choose him of her own free will.

I know Team Stefan fans are upset with the Damon/Elena pairing. And if she’s sired to Damon and if he forced her to have sex with him, that would most certainly be upsetting. It would be rape. But, c’mon guys – Damon may be in touch with his bad boy side, but he is not a rapist.

I was most upset by the article I read on io9 today: “at this point, Elena literally has no free will. Or hardly any. She’s just a puppet.” Ouch. I don’t see it that way. At. All. The show has always emphasized the importance of choice, especially for Elena’s character. She chose Stefan – when she was human. And now, as a vampire, her heart and mind have changed. She has chosen Damon. I really don’t think there’s a sire bond. And if there is? I don’t think Damon is utilizing it. Damon said last night that he’s never seen Elena as alive as she is now. And I think that encompasses her being a strong, independent woman – making her own choices.

The io9 article also says that Damon likes Elena more now that she’s a vampire. Nope. Damon has always loved Elena for exactly who she is. He even made it clear earlier this season that he loves her either way – human or vampire. His love for her is unconditional. Stefan’s love, on the other hand, is not. It’s clear he doesn’t want her as a vampire. He hates himself for being a vampire – and now he hates her being one. He cannot accept her embracing her vampire side. I’ve been Team Damon for a while now, but still had a soft spot for Stefan. But now? He’s off his rocker.

I also want to add that I love Damon even more for many things in last night’s episode: when Stefan told him about the break up, Damon offered up brother bonding time before going to see Elena; when he did see Elena, he was a perfect gentlemen; the expression on his face when she told him he was the reason.
So. Those are my thoughts. Just had to share them. A lot of other things happened in last night’s explosive episode, but this is all I’ve got time for. Looking forward to the next couple weeks in Mystic Falls before we get our winter hiatus!

Why blood?

“Blood is life, lack-brain. Why do you think we eat it?
It’s what keeps you going. Makes you warm. Makes you hard.
Makes you other than dead.” – Spike

Buffy the Vampire Slayer - season five

For my Jungian Psychology class, I recently read Ego and Archetype by Edward Edinger. Now that I’ve survived the research paper process, I want to look at something else I came across in his text.  In discussing Christ as the symbol of Self, Edinger expounds on the significance of the blood of Christ, pausing to first explore the significance of blood. I couldn’t help but think of vampires. Our society is clearly enamored with the vampire myth right now, and I do often wonder what keeps drawing us in.  For the record, I am not drawing a parallel to Christ and vampires, but if you look at Edinger’s chart here, you will see one of the first off shoots is Blood, which leads to many common themes we’re seeing now, especially since Buffy, and now in things like Vampire Diaries, Twilight etc… soul, life, desire, guilt, wrath, vengeance, victim, drinking blood…

Here are some quotes from Edinger that really speak to the resonance of blood imagery, inherent in vampire tales. I could probably turn this into an essay, but for now I’ll be a bit lazy and just leave them for each of you to contemplate. This is some pretty powerful symbolism that stretches back really far, making it even more powerful in our collective unconscious. No wonder we’re fascinated by it.

“Since primitive times blood has carried numinous implications. The blood was considered to be the seat of life or soul” (227).

“Blood as the essence of life itself was the most precious thing of which man could conceive . . . Hence the ancient Hebrews were forbidden to eat blood” (228).

“According to primitive thinking (i.e., unconscious thinking) it is not that it is morally wrong to take the life of another but rather that it is highly dangerous to interfere with such a potent substance as blood” (228).

“Understood psychologically, blood represents the life of the soul, of transpersonal origin, exceedingly precious and potent. It is to be reverenced as divine and any effort of the ego to manipulate, appropriate or destroy it for personal purposes provokes vengeance or retribution” (228).

PCA/ACA 6

And after three wonderful, geek-filled days, the PCA finally had to come to an end. I must say it’s been so fun revisiting all these great panels through writing these blog posts. Many thanks to those of you that have been reading along! It’s really been fun to share.

On Saturday, the last day of PCA, I first attended the panel Vampires and Heroes.
Megan Stoner Morgan discussed “Dr. Horrible as Byronic Hero.” She examined his blog as his form of resistance as well as a social place to state complaints.  Even though he’s ostracized from society, he connects with his fellow outcasts.  Society here is depicted as the root of evil. We see the loss of his beloved to Captain Hammer drive his rebellion further, with Penny’s death then completing his descent as Byronic hero. Megan characterized Horrible as “charismatic but gloomy hero” and said that while he’s admirable for taking on society, his character is ultimately unrelatable. In her final claim, Megan assessed that Dr. Horrible itself encourages rebellion against the studios.
Anaya Mukherjea presented “Am I a Righteous Man? Vampire masculinity, morality, honor and romance.” She said that the old metaphor of the vampire kiss still persists, but is now compounded with the vampire having love for a young, human female and being in need of redemption. She said this new myth also calls for the frail human woman becoming empowered.  Anaya looked at Buffy as a hero functioning beyond her love of Angel and Spike. She also discussed LJ Smith’s Hanna and Simon and Zooey of the Silver Kiss, series I am unfamiliar with. Anaya concluded that in Whedon’s works, the vampire soul brings forth an ontological and existential argument. She concluded with a quote from Stacey Abbott indicating that it’s not Angel’s soul that sets him on his good path: it’s Buffy.
Tamy Burnett put forth an interesting argument in “Dead Women and Visions of Masculinities in Angel and Supernatural.” She posited these series as the post-girl power male-centric fantasy TV. She identified that when these series kill off female characters, they are not resurrected like their male counterparts. Tamy characterized the women in Angel as guides and motivators for the males; ultimately, the males are defined and shaped by the females. She discussed the idea of martyred mothers as seen on Angel with Darla and Cordy and in Supernatural with Mary. She also examined the dead female friend, Angel’s Fred and Supernatural’s Ellen and Joe. Tamy concluded that this series could enjoy commercial success without sacrificing females.
I would like to add that this very concern came up at this year’s Supernatural panel aat the PaleyFest. Creator Eric Kripke indicated, with a laugh, that they just tend to kill off a lot of people, male or female.
In the final paper, Heather Enrichs Angell presented “The Vampire Lover : Rethinking the Feminist Response to the Fang Phenomena.” She examined True Blood and Twilight, claiming that the good feminist debate has power imbalance, disregards media theory, and misses underlying feminist qualities that reader’s try to bring to the text. Her ultimate claim was that in these texts the female body serves as the landscape that the men fight over, but that Bella and Sookie maintainthe dominant voice. Heather discussed perspectives of the good feminist, the hegemonic feminist, and the academic feminist. I will admit that I’m not well-versed in all the subcategories of feminism. I have noted such extreme differences though that I do find that having all these varying viewpoints under the giant umbrella of feminism sometimes acts as a disservice. I’ve had many people assume I’m a feminist because I’m a fan of Joss Whedon, but what the word “feminist” means to them and what it means to me does not always coincide.  Hmmm, this sounds like a good topic for a whole other blog post some time.

After this final Whedon panel, Tanya Cochran and I had a brief discussion about the idea that people assume you like “vampire stories” if you like Buffy and Angel. I’ve come across this a lot and find it amusing, especially because Buffy isn’t a show about vampires – it’s a show about a vampire slayer! Angel and Spike are the exceptions in a verse filled with very bad, undesirable vampires. Tanya said she’s never drawn to a text because of vampires, and mentioned some popular ones that she’s never delved into. I told her how I keep coming across vampires in narratives that I’ve been drawn to that just happen to have vampires in them.  Take Vampire Diaries for example – I didn’t start watching it because of vampires, but for my love of Kevin Williamson. It’s interesting watching the vampire permeation of our culture, as well as the assumptions made about individuals based on the vampire texts (books and television series) they watch and write about. :)

I was then very excited about the final panel I could attend at PCA: “Pop Culture in the Classroom.” I was absolutely shocked to discover that only one of the presenters showed up! How rude! The poor chair was absolutely stunned. While this could have turned into a dud, the one panelist present dazzled us all! Aimee Blau Robison carried the session with confidence and charm with her presentation “Using Facebook in the Classroom.” She utilizes it as an additional tool to connect with the students. She indicated that one of the problems now is getting students to digitally disconnect in the classroom. Her solution is to connect with their digital world outside of the classroom to keep conversations going. Her ultimate claim is that “knowledge is socially constructive.” She discussed the idea of William Kist to use a “spoonful of sugar to make the print go down.” Aimee utilizes Facebook to get her students discussing possible issues/topics for their research paper. She even encourages them to scan their news feed for ideas, to look at what people are discussing. She lists the goals for student’s Facebook use, and then spotlights good dialogue from the net inside the classroom. It’s important to note that she’s not using Facebook inside the classroom. In fact, she even requests no lap top use so students are focused and attentive when in class.
On a final note, the panel chair, Erik Walker, noted that if you aren’t quite comfortable venturing into the Facebook sphere with your students yet, you can use edmodo.com as a “safer” alternative.

I don’t even know how to end this post! I couldn’t believe the conference was over as quick as it was, and now I can’t believe that, two weeks later, I’m just wrapping up writing about it. There were a lot of great people, wonderful ideas, and many sources of inspiration! Two giant thumbs up for the success of the PCA.