Plato’s Symposium

The SymposiumThe Symposium by Plato

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Excellent intro in this edition that sets the stage, provides historical background, and offers insight and analysis into the dialogue. Between that and my introduction to Plato with The Phaedrus in my Philosophy course, I was prepared to tackle The Symposium, and I rather enjoyed it. Love is always an intriguing topic, in my opinion, and the various opinions shared on it through the dialogue are fascinating. I felt there was an overall light tone to the dialogue, and I settled in feeling like I was sitting around with these friends, lying on my own couch, and enjoying the symposium.

View all my reviews

Spring 2011

This week I attended my third and final session for the spring quarter at Pacifica. It’s been a good way to ease back into things as I only had two courses this quarter instead of the usual three. (However, philosophy has kicked my butt enough that it feels like it’s taken up the time of two classes!).  And, now, two and a half years after I started the program, I’m getting close to finishing my first year of PhD work! It feels really good. I knew I had to take the leave of absence when I did, just as I knew I really needed to return when I did. I’ve been welcomed back with open arms by old and new friends. I really cannot ever emphasize how blessed I feel for this entire experience.

The course work for this session was daunting for my Philosophy class yet great for my Jungian Psych class. I’m just going to brain dump my thoughts about the week now.  ;)

On Monday night, I met my Philosophy teacher at the hotel bar. (Yes, we stay at a hotel for our school, and sometimes I’m taken aback when I see a family in swim suits or something. I forget some people are there for vacation! ;) ). My Philosophy professor is absolutely brilliant. I honestly told her that night that when she’s lecturing, I’m right there with her and it all makes sense. But then I go home and read new material and I’m lost again. I think she appreciated my honesty, and she was glad it at least makes sense in the classroom for me.  I seriously could see this class absolutely flattening me if I had any other teacher. Ultimately, she has convinced me I have enough of a thread to go on to start my Philosophy paper. There was one idea in our second session that really stuck out to me: Kant places thinking above all else. He’s really putting humans at the top of the totem pole, and everything else below it. So what about nature? Won’t this eventually bite us in the ass? We aren’t the biggest thing out there. So, of course, this train of though led me to pop culture… and images from The Happening kept playing in my brain. So, my mission right now is to re-read Kant, re-watch The Happening, and then probably re-read Kant again and see how it all gels together.

On Tuesday we had our Philosophy lecture.  Have I told you these classes are usually about season hours a day? Our instructors really amaze me. The longest I’ve ever taught in one block for one class is four hours. Seven hours could be painful. Fortunately, I’ve yet to have a teacher that makes me feel like scratching my eyes out.  Something as challenging for me though as Philosophy is really intense brain power for seven hours! Because of my fast typing skills, I can take notes nearly verbatim. This is a great advantage because I will hit spells where things stop sinking in, but then I can review them later in my notes. On Tuesday we explored a lot of Derrida. Fortunately, when we got to his “Plato’s Pharmacy” from Dissemination I was actually able to keep up. I had read in a review that Dissemination is perhaps one of his easiest-to-read texts. And we had read The Phaedrus, which he analyzes, at the beginning of the semester, so I already had a grasp on Plato. It was actually really interesting.

Wednesday was my Jungian Psychology class.  We continued an in-depth exploration of Jungian concepts, focusing greatly on the archetype of the self. We also had to view the original The Day the Earth Stood Still which contained an archetype so many of us were surprised to have not picked up on: the Christ figure! A being comes to the Earth, looks like man, walks among men, has an important message, is killed and resurrected. Klattu even takes on the name Carpenter! Now I want to rewatch the film and play with those ideas. That’s what’s really so crazy about these classes: every five minutes will be packed with something you could spend years exploring and playing with! So you grab the best of your ideas and run with ‘em, hoping to at least get a paper topic out of it for the class, and, if you’re lucky, something applicable to your dissertation. For this class, I was drawn immediately to the concept of the Shadow, which always makes me think of one book in particular: Ursula Le Guin’s A Wizard of Earthsea. I haven’t read the book in quite a while, so I’ll be re-reading that this week and delving into all the implications and ramifications of Ged’s shadow. I’m excited about this work!

In the meantime, I’m just a week away from my summer semester of teaching ending. Whew. I absolutely adore my job and wouldn’t want any other job in the world, but when the break comes around, it’s always welcomed.

This week in Philosophy…

The Critique of Judgement: The Critique of Aesthetic JudgementThe Critique of Judgement: The Critique of Aesthetic Judgement by Immanuel Kant

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Another reading for Mythology & Philosophy course. We were assigned the “second book.” If time allows, and especially if I utilize Kant in my research paper, I want to go back and read the “first book.” The first book purely discusses beauty. The part we read is devoted to “Analytic of the sublime.” I will admit that when I first sat down with this reading, I thought of how I just kind of have a fuzzy impression of “sublime.” It’s not a word/concept I’ve ever given much thought. I decided to look it up: “impressing the mind with a sense of grandeur or power; inspiring awe, veneration, etc.” I figured that was a good start. When I started reading though, I realized that this definition was rather simplistic, as I ultimately had before me seventy pages of Kant exploring all of the variations and implications of “sublime.”

To begin with, Kant does set up a clear distinction of “beautiful” and “sublime.” To state it briefly, the beautiful is concerned with an object that has form, understanding, quality, play, pleasure and love; the sublime is concerned with a formless object, reason, quantity, emotion, respect, and esteem. I found Kant’s discussion and dissection stirring and, well, shall I use the term??… beautiful! And, at times, perhaps, it was sublime for me. Beyond the object of the text, some passages elevated my mind, excited me with images or nature, and served to remind me of its captivation. Kant does look at the sublime in nature, which is ultimately glorious not exactly for how it looks/sounds but for what it IS. As the example Kant uses: if you believe to be listening to a nightingale, the experience will be wondrous; yet when you discover it was just a boy in the bush with an instrument, all charm is gone.

A colleague recently told me that the English translators have done Kant great justice. Apparently his original German form is not only more difficult to get through, but also not as impressive. I can’t speak to this since I am limited (and I really do mean that in every sense of the word) to English. I really enjoyed this translation though and do believe I find myself falling in love with Kant! He recognizes a link between morality and nature, indicating that “to take an immediate interest in the beauty of nature is always a mark of a good soul.” I believe he has a true understanding of the human condition and can speak to it and about it remarkably.

About Religion: Economies of Faith in Virtual Culture (Religion and Postmodernism Series)About Religion: Economies of Faith in Virtual Culture by Mark C. Taylor

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

For my Mythology & Philosophy course, we read chapter 7 (“The Virtual Kingdom.”) To be honest, what really struck me about this reading is how unfamiliar I am with history. Not that this is a surprise, but I really wish I had a better understanding of place and time. This chapter examines how we got to the 1990′s by way of where we were 200 years prior. As Taylor argues, “It is virtually impossible to understand adequately the significance of cultural developments in the twentieth century without an appreciation for the ways in which philosophers and poets appropriated and elaborated Kant’s insights.” This also served as my first introduction to Kant. The discussion turns to look at what is art and what is not art, and also discusses ideas of purposiveness, cleverly pointing out that even “uselessness has its uses.” The chapter also includes references to Hegel and Warhol as it pulls together the transformations seen through the last 200 years. To conclude, “As image is embodied in reality and reality becomes a ‘matter’ of image, art is realized in a wold that is effectively transformed into a work of art.”

View all my reviews

Plato’s Phaedrus

Plato's Phaedrus: A Translation With Notes, Glossary, Appendices, Interpretive Essay and Introduction (Focus Philosophical Library)Plato’s Phaedrus: A Translation With Notes, Glossary, Appendices, Interpretive Essay and Introduction by Stephen Scully
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

To be honest, I wasn’t particularly enthralled with Plato’s writing. The form of the dialogues has never been terribly appealing to me. Nevertheless, I gave it a complete read for my Myth & Philosophy class. We were assigned articles to read about Plato & Phaedrus, which were most beneficial and actually quite interesting. Plato does present a lot of interesting ideas and construct the dialogue in a brilliant way, so I do have a deep sense of appreciation for what he did here. Furthermore, I was absolutely fascinated as we discussed Plato in class. Learning about the Peloponnesian war and what he was born into really help to crystallize his perspective. Historically, I find his work fascinating. And, in recognizing his motivations, I have a great respect for him.

View all my reviews