Wednesday was another great day!!! Here’s a quick, run down of the intellectually stimulating day in the second day in Ginette Paris’ class.
Oh, and first? One of my peers described her in the perfect way: She’s our Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher. ![]()
We talked about religion and that Jung believed there’s a religious function to the psyche. There’s a natural part of us that will express that WOW when you experience something bigger than you (like birthing a child, or even witnessing it). Ultimately, we have a natural, religious instinct. Therefore, today’s psychology is religious. However, it’s in an invisible sense. And we often don’t recognize that it’s Christian. We’ve been with it so long, essentially, that we don’t even see it. There’s a hidden morality but because it’s hidden it is not the same as the numinous experience Jung was talking about. In his texts, James Hillman says that we’re so monotheistic that we’ve forgotten about the polytheistic view, which can provide a better model of our psyche. Ginette said that it may seem like Hillman is selling polytheism, but he’s actually pushing for a needed balance in a montheistic/polytheistic approach. He’s taking us back to the Greeks because we also live in a Greek/Roman culture. Yet, at the same time, looking at the differences from the ancient Greek culture shows us how really Christian our traditions are.
We talked about psychic wounds, to which Ginette gave us this brilliant wisdom: “It’s only when you’re wounded that you connect with others . . . Being broken forces us to the wisdom of the psyche.” Beautiful. Profound. So many good things I’m still chewing on from these first three days!!
Something that came up that maybe someone out there needs to here: “Guilt is a waste of psychic energy.”
In reviewing Hillman’s Revisioning Psychology, I came across this powerful quote I highlighted: “Feeling is all. Discover your feelings; trust your feelings. The human heart is the way to soul and what psychology is all about” (181).
We talked about the body. Ginette says that all archetypes have a somatic aspect. And also? Courage is in the body. If a man jumps into a river to save children and is asked what he was thinking when jumped, he will say he wasn’t thinking anything.
Discussing Depth Psychology: it does away with the question of WHY and asks HOW? WHAT? WHO? If you can identify something that is going on, what archetype is presenting itself in the psyche, then you mythologize, and really, begin to heal.
Ginette told us that training in mythology will refine our capacity to perceive.
So, there’s another stream-of-consciousness post without any proofreading. I hope you find some tidbits that resonate with you! As for me, it’s yummy, fresh breakfast time again!
Namaste.
Tag Archives: Pacifica
Summer School, Day 2
And Tuesday began the adventure into Ginette Paris’ wonderful class on Post-Jungian & Archetypal theories! I’m just going to give a quick run down of some highlights from yesterday.
We started the morning with this bit of wisdom from her lecture: We always see reality through a frame. Human language is full of metaphors – you just have to catch them.
We discussed how we personify objects. Oh yeah! I’ve named all my electronic devices, and while my car herself doesn’t have a name, she has always definitely been a “she.” We discussed what computers mean to different groups. For children, it’s a friend; for men, a toy; for women, a tool.
As we discussed symbols, Ginette revealed: “The person is the most complex symbol.”
We discussed Lady Liberty, a powerful symbol throughout the world and our most powerful symbol in the U.S. Liberty is a concept. Lady Liberty is an archetype. I kept thinking of the first (only) time I saw the statue of Liberty and was moved to tears. Powerful indeed. And I just feel compelled to mention our dog is named Liberty! ![]()
We discussed Greek Myth as more of a psychology than a religion. It is deeply rooted in images, and that’s what Hillman wants to bring us back to. (We discussed James Hillman’s work all day).
We discussed cinema! Ginette deemed it our main myth maker. It doesn’t need a text to refer us to because we feel it. She said if it’s a bad movie it won’t change the myth because it’s not moving. She brought up Avatar and how it was bringing us back to nature, revisiting the god and goddess myth. A student added that it was a film people wanted. Ginette commented that the artists know what the community needs.
We talked about a book called The History of Economy. The idea there is that the economy only works when the feminine idea of saving and the masculine idea of risk taking is in balance. Right now, Wall Street is an adolescent area, filled with game playing. Where is the Wise Old Man figure?
We talked about an important image to Jung: that of the ocean as depth psychology. Like the ocean, depth psychology has abysmal depth and it can be mapped. You go into this ocean in analysis, and the analyst is the one on the ship holding onto your cable, ready to bring you back up.
We did an exercise in active imagination to find our anima/animus. Though my animus did not come to me at this time, I had an a-ha moment later in lecture where I discovered him.
As students shared what they discovered in themselves, Ginette said that whenever you’re surprised by an image from the psyche, that means it’s genuine and not an ego image. If it’s not surprising, it’s probably the ego speaking.
We talked about Jung’s theory on love. Basically, you fall in love with a person who is your inner anima/animus. It’s really your projection. The real love then begins when start picking up your projections.
We talked about pathology. Really, we’re all a bit neurotic. Ginette said that many think of therapy as an investment, but she sees it as an adventure. Ultimately, psychological problems are part of our humanity, but they eventually become our wisdom.
Ginette talked a bit about her newest book and heart break and gave this wisdom: “You cannot be heroic with a heart break. You can only be wise about it.”
We talked about the treatment fantasy, where we think we can fix ours or others problems. But when you’re being medical with something that’s not medical, you’re harming the soul. Soul problems can’t be fixed like broken bones. We need to serve the soul, to let it lead, as Hillman directs.
Those are the highlights! It was a great day. Hope you enjoyed these tidbit and it doesn’t read too awkwardly. I’m not proofreading, as it’s now time for breakfast!!
Summer School, Day 1
I had a wonderful, beautiful day! And I just wrote a beautiful blog post about it that I lost! Let’s see if I can recapture the magic.
Today we had a colloquium with Dr. Clayton Koelb. He studied Comparative Literature at Harvard and now teaches in the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is well versed in German studies, to say the least! Today he discussed Goethe’s Faust and Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy. I was very appreciative of the historical context he provided us with. As I have admitted before, my historical knowledge in general is rather sparse. I have grown to have a deep appreciation for history, and I understand its significance. Unfortunately, I never took many history classes and never had a particularly good or captivating teacher. I am picking up quite a bit though as I move through these different texts and our instructors help us fill in the historical gaps that, thankfully, I’m not the only one unfamiliar with. It really enlivens a text when you understand the influences on the writers, including their historical setting. Ultimately today I gained a much better understanding of Goethe’s second part of Faust, which has apparently been deemed so difficult that most German schools don’t even teach it!! I still prefer the first part, which just has more fun drama in my opinion, but I do appreciate the second part more now that I grasp its complexities. As for Nietzsche, I have a much more thorough understanding of his discussion on Apollo and Dionysus, though I know we really only scratched the surface of the text overall in our discussion today. These are very expansive texts, and today was a great overview of them that will allow us to explore more. Overall, there was about seven hours of lecture time. I happily took notes on my iPad with my wireless Apple keyboard. I really enjoy this 1) because it’s lighter than my laptop and 2) because I love having notes to review later. It’s really just such loaded days when we’re up here that I find it rather impossible to really digest all the information as I receive it. Typing is one of the best skills I ever learned! I just about captured a full transcript of the day, and I know there’s a lot of good material in there that I can review later at a slower pace.
Over the next four days, we’ll be in a Post-Jungian Psych course with Ginette Paris. You will remember her and her book Wisdom of the Psyche from a couple of my recent posts. I am really thrilled about taking this course and working with her after reading her profound text. We met with her this evening and she is amazing. You won’t believe the wonderful classroom environment she has designed for us! She has said that the open areas on either side of the classroom are “the beach.” She has invited us to bring blankets and pillows and to go lie on the beach whenever our bodies need a break. She is very aware of the difficulty in sitting in 7/8 hour lectures for 5 days and wants us to listen to our bodies. Furthermore, she said that she understands that sometimes a great idea will strike you during a lecture and she understands if we need to close our eyes for a couple minutes, retreat inwards, and work with our thoughts, even if it means missing a few minutes of what she’s saying. And, to top it all off, she will be providing us with all her lecture notes and power point presentations at the end of the course session, so she told us not to “take notes obsessively.” (I felt she was talking directly to me!!). As much as I do enjoy my note taking, I really like this idea of having access to all the information later and just being able to sit with the ideas as she lectures. She encouraged us to jot some notes down as we get our own ideas, but really emphasized not to worry about capturing any of her ideas. In the morning I’m going to pick up a small notebook for my own little note taking. I feel handwriting will be conducive to this, and I won’t be toting the Apple keyboard for the remainder of the week. This is going to be a really neat classroom experience.
Overall, I’m really thrilled with this experience. There are two campuses at the school attend, and we’re on the one with the dorms now that I haven’t previously attended. I’m enjoying my first lil’ dorm experience. I had heard horror stories, but have found everything to be quite pleasant! The room is small, yes, but I think it’s quaint. It’s got everything needed: twin bed, night stand, small desk, chair, medicine cabinet, sink, and small closet space. The showers for women are in the basement (which conjures an inaccurate frightful image). The showers are enclosed in individual stalls, have good water pressure, and supply hot water! That’s all I need. And then after you get ready in the morning, you just walk over to the dining hall for a nice, warm breakfast!
At the end of our scholastic adventures for the day, several of my peers and I went down to the beach at sunset. So beautiful! So refreshing! We took a good long walk, which was much needed after all the sitting of the day, and the fresh air was crisp and wondrous.
This is a blessed experience indeed!
Studying Mythology
I often get asked what I study. Mythological Studies with an Emphasis in Depth Psychology. Then I get asked again. What?
Myth. Mythology. Loaded words. Often with the terrible connotation of falsehoods.
Depth Psychology. An uncommon term out of the psych world. Mention Freud and people think you’re studying phallic imagery and Freudian slips. Mention Jung and my own students have not even heard of him (gasp!).
I think my friend Priscilla sums up our PhD program best on her website: “a high fallootin’ way to say that I’m studying the Humanities with an emphasis on cultural narrative and archetypal symbolism flavored with psychological theory.”
I plan to write some posts in the near future on my definition of myth and on an exploration of the various definitions available for depth psychology. To quote my instructor Christine Downing, “It’s impossible to define myth, but cowardly not to try.”
Today I want to write a little bit about why I study myth. Last night I went through all my notations and highlights from Ginette Paris’ book Wisdom of the Psyche, which I read last week. This book really had a profound effect on me. I think it’s going to influence all my work, personal and professional, in a manner close to that of Joseph Campbell‘s Hero with a Thousand Faces.
There’s one quote in particular from the text that I keep turning back to, and I think it really shows why I study myth, why I am so drawn to it:
“One needs to turn to the humanities to understand images that come out of the suffering of the soul” (Paris 34, 35).
I can hear Campbell’s voice echoing here, and I think of some of my favorite quotes from his book Pathways to Bliss:
“Life is a horrendous presence, and you wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for that. The first function of a mythological order has been to reconcile consciousness to this fact” (3).
He tells us simply:
“All life stinks, and you must embrace that with compassion” (77).
When I was introduced to Joseph Campbell in my undergraduate studies, I was just learning to live with an injury that has left me with chronic pain. The short story is that I suffered nerve damage in my rib in addition to some fractured cartilage (which cannot be reset). This ultimately means that my nerves misfire, leading to an unnecessary signal of pain to the brain. I say unnecessary because pain serves the function of letting us know something is wrong and needs our attention. Chronic pain, on the other hand, is like a signal that won’t stop (think of Russo’s looped message on LOST!) but is no longer needed. So how does this affect me? Anytime I do anything that involves my core (which is pretty much anything aside from sitting), I am at risk of aggravating it. Also, since it misfires, I’m even at risk of pain when I’m sitting. This is particularly distressing for me because I used to be an athlete. Though I am greatly blessed and deeply thankful that my injury is not as bad as it was when I was injured nearly a decade ago (at the time I had to quit work and was barely able to finish college), I am still limited, and it is still something I am dealing with and honestly always continuing to process and re-process both physically and mentally. (And a a part of this process has been thirteen different doctors and specialists and countless treatments and procedures, something which itself has a draining affect on a person). And that’s where myth and the study of myth comes in for me. Joseph Campbell’s Hero with a Thousand Faces was the first thing that took me out of my uneasy, worried, distraught mental space. It opened my mind to a whole world. To come back to Ginette Paris,
“A richness of imagination is the best cure against despair. Perhaps the most important question for the survival of the psyche is: Who shall I be, until I die? I have to imagine something, an interesting myth of some sort” (196).
Myth speaks the language of the psyche, and it is a beautiful place to go to for healing the psyche. Myth allowed me to find a new path, personally and professionally. It is a place I am continually exploring for mental and spiritual healing. Furthermore, though I was working on my undergraduate degree before the injury, I had no intentions of remaining in the academic world. I never imagined I would be a teacher or work on a doctorate degree. I followed Campbell’s infamous words of following your bliss, which started in literature, and spread into mythology. Because of my career in academia, as a currently life-long student and now teacher, I have not let my injury define me. I have claimed my success in spite of it.
Despite my background in English and my profession as an English teacher, putting all these ideas into words is actually rather difficult for me, and this may be a rather disjointed post, but it comes from the heart. But, afterall,
“My friend Heinrich Zimmer used to say the best thing can’t be said . . . The second best are misunderstood. That’s because the second best are using the objects of time and space to refer to transcendence. And they are always misunderstood . . . The third best: that’s conversation. We’re using the third best in order to talk about the first and second best” (The Hero‘s Journey, 41).
I believe in the power of words, but I also know there is much they cannot capture. In blogging, I’m attempting a conversation with people. I don’t have a lot of readers, but this leads me to deeply treasure the ones I have. Also, it’s okay that I don’t have a lot of readers (it is about quality, not quantity, after all). And, all this writing is simply for me as well, helping me process the steps I make in my studies. Because of my very nature, I actually can’t not write.
I do want to add that I’m not writing because I think I’m the world’s most brilliant academic and because I think I will enlighten and change you all. Not nearly. This is not self-aggrandizement, not by a long shot. And I hope I’m never read that way. I write to connect, to share, because I think things are richer when they are shared. Because “the psyche is inherently mitmenschlich [inter-personal]” (James Hillman, Healing Fiction 106). Furthermore, as Hillman also asserts, the soul wants community. And I am finding a very rich community online, which includes the people I know in “real life.” The PhD program I am a part of is a commuter school. Most of us live in different states! We get to see each other once a month for three days (with the exception of our upcoming five day summer session), and then we’re on our own again to read and process all the great texts being dumped into our laps. I miss that sense of campus community I was fortunate to have in my MA program, and find that online is a great substitute. So, today I’ve invited you all in and shown you a little more today about me, my past, and how I came to find mythology and the study of mythology so powerful and, quite frankly, so damn important.
I’ll leave you with one final thought from Ginette Paris:
“No explanation can reveal the mystery of human consciousness, no theory can ‘explain’ the relationship with oneself and with others as no theory ever could explain love. No living person can fully explain oneself to oneself, not to another, any more than we can explain why music moves us. Still, we can all develop an appreciation of music and the arts [and mythology!]. Similarly, an appreciation for the richness and depth of the psyche can be developed, an immense enrichment in the quality of life.”
Garden Tour
“One of the most transformative things about Pacifica is the grounds.”
- Dr. Sipiora
In the May session at Pacifica (click for a virtual tour), we had a great opportunity to attend a tour of the gardens with Marshall Chrostowski, the groundskeeper, and Dr. Michael Sipiora. Over my time at Pacifica, I have explored the garden paths countless times. It really is a breathtaking place to be. All you hear is your own feet rustling the leaves and the birds chirping above. There is no city noise, no traffic, no rush. I didn’t know this experience could be further enriched!
Marshall has been tending the grounds since the 1989. It was amazing to hear how he planned things, why he chose certain plants and trees, and where some of these plants and trees came from! I wish I could remember all the details now, and I really hope that he writes a book about it all! There are so many stories behind every bit of plant life. He’s even planned for the way the natural ecology will transform everything over time for future generations. Dr. Siporia also explained how the choices in the plant life resonate with our school’s depth psychology foundation, including how they tend to the soul and to the earth.
Please enjoy this slideshow, which includes a cameo from the campus cat.
What is Mythological Studies?
For those of you curious about what exactly I’m up to, this is the description of my MA/PHD Mythological Studies program:
“Explores the understanding of human experience revealed in mythology and in the manifold links between myth and ritual, literature, art, and religious experience. Special attention is given to depth psychological and archetypal approaches to the study of myth.”
So at the heart of everything is depth psychology, which can be defined as:
“The modern field of depth psychology originates in the work of Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud, who called attention to the importance of what lies ‘below the surface’ of conscious awareness. This dimension of psychic reality is revealed in the literary genres of the time, in the expressive arts of a culture, in dreams, and in the symptoms of individuals and communities. These ideas [include] the importance of symbol and metaphor in personal and cultural imagery [and] the recognition of the dynamic interplay between the natural world and the human psyche.”
Here’s a great video that explains more about the program. It’s really a rich and unique educational experience. Enjoy!
